La peste verte

La peste verte
Just another Blogvie.com weblog

Hamas accused of intimidating Christians

juin 21st, 2008

Hamas accused of intimidating Christians
Church leaders said coerced into attending speech urging spread of Islam


Posted: November 06, 2007
1:00 am Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com

Christian leaders in the Gaza Strip were intimidated into attending and expressing support for a speech yesterday in which the territory’s Hamas leader urged the worldwide spread of Islam, according to sources in Gaza’s Christian community.

Artinious Alexious, priest of Gaza’s Greek Orthodox Church, and Emanuel Salum, a Catholic leader in Gaza, were at a major speech yesterday by Ismail Haniyeh, leader of the Hamas government in Gaza and deposed prime minister of the previously Hamas-run Palestinian Authority.

Also present were hundreds of gunmen, including members of a group, Jihadia Salafiya, suspected of carrying out anti-Christian attacks in Gaza such as the lobbing of grenades last September at Alexious’ church.

Hamas banned most international media from covering the event, only allowing entry to journalists accredited by the terror group.

A major theme of Haniyeh’s speech was the spread of Islamic values throughout the world, according to reporters in attendance.

(Story continues below) adsonar_placementId=1270202;adsonar_pid=663759;adsonar_ps=1451068;adsonar_zw=300;adsonar_zh=250;adsonar_jv=”ads.adsonar.com”;

Haniyeh also strongly denied Hamas had plans to take over the West Bank, as many recent reports had speculated.

The reporters present said at one point during his speech, Haniyeh spoke about the “excellent” situation for Christians living under Hamas rule in Gaza.

He pointed to the two Christian leaders in attendance, at which point the two raised their hands and nodded in agreement, witnesses told WND.

According to sources in Gaza’s Christian community speaking on condition of anonymity, Alexious and Salum were intimidated into attending the speech. The sources said in recent weeks Haniyeh’s office repeatedly called the Christian leaders to request they free their schedules to assist in yesterday’s event.

“The priests thought it was a diplomatic way to threaten them and put pressure on them,” said one source.

“After discussions within the Christian community leadership it was decided it would be dangerous not to assist in the meeting even though it would be very strange to see priests assisting in a meeting about the spread of Islam,” the source said.

Hamas in June seized complete control of the Gaza Strip from Fatah amid widespread fears it would impose hard-line Islamic rule in the territory, and that life for Christians might deteriorate.

About 3,000 Christians live in the Gaza Strip, which has a population of over 1 million.

There have been a slew of recent alleged anti-Christian attacks in Gaza, including the murder last month of a Christian bookstore owner whose beaten, bullet-ridden body was found after his shop had been repeatedly targeted by Islamists. Rami Ayyad, who managed the only Christian bookstore in Gaza, had also been threatened multiple times by local Islamist groups.

Christians warned: Accept Islamic law

Sheik Abu Saqer, leader of Jihadia Salafiya, an Islamic outreach movement that recently announced the opening of a “military wing” to enforce Muslim law in Gaza, told WND in a recent interview all Christians in Gaza engaged in missionary activity will be “dealt with harshly.”

Abu Saqer’s group, present at Haniyeh’s speech yesterday, has been accused of firebombing Ayyad’s bookstore in April. Jihadia Salafiya is also suspected of a series of Islamist attacks, including firebombing Internet cafes and one in May against a United Nations school in Gaza after it allowed boys and girls to participate in the same sporting event. One person was killed in that attack.

“[Now that Hamas is in power,] the situation has changed 180 degrees in Gaza,” said Abu Saqer, speaking from Gaza.

“Jihadia Salafiya and other Islamic movements will ensure Christian schools and institutions show publicly what they are teaching to be sure they are not carrying out missionary activity,” he said.

Abu Saqer accused the leadership of the Gaza Christian community of “proselytizing and trying to convert Muslims with funding from American evangelicals.”

“This missionary activity is endangering the entire Christian community in Gaza,” he said.

Abu Saqer claimed there was “no need” for the thousands of Christians in Gaza to maintain a large number of institutions in the territory.

He said Hamas “must work to impose an Islamic rule or it will lose the authority it has and the will of the people.”

<br>

The Hamas Propaganda War

juin 21st, 2008
COMMUNIQUE: 28 January 2008
E-mail to a friend
Print this page
Text Size: A A

Special Report: The Hamas Propaganda WarHow the MSM handed Hamas a PR victory.
function titleFontChange(inc){ var fSize = document.getElementById(’titleSpan’).style.fontSize fSize = fSize.substring(0,2) if(Number(fSize)32) fSize = 32; document.getElementById(’titleSpan’).style.fontSize = (Number(fSize) + inc) +”px”; }

Images of Gaza plunged in darkness alongside pictures of Palestinians streaming across the border to Egypt provided Hamas with a significant public relations victory last week. It wouldn’t have been possible without the complicity of major media, all too happy to invoke the usual narrative of Israel as the “bad guy” and the Palestinians as “the victims.”

While Israel’s image undoubtedly took a mauling, the bigger picture is starting to emerge - one that shows how Hamas was able to pull off a sophisticated operation before the eyes of the mainstream media (MSM).

A ‘cycle of violence’?

Most media presented the Gaza crisis in a manner similar to the AP:

It started last week with what Israel says was the inadvertent killing of a son of Gaza strongman Mahmoud Zahar in an Israeli arrest raid. Hamas retaliated with rocket barrages on Israel, and Israel struck back by sealing Gaza hermetically and cutting off fuel shipments. Several days later, Gaza militants blew down the border wall with Egypt, effectively ending the Israeli blockade, which had been tacitly backed by Egypt.

Why did the media fail to add the vital context? Since Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in mid-June 2007 until the end of December 2007, 475 missiles and 631 mortars were fired at Sderot and the surrounding region. Since January 16, 2008, well over 200 Qassams and mortars have been fired by Palestinian terrorists from Gaza.

Despite this, most media chose to attribute Israeli security measures as the cause of the Gaza situation rather than the continuous Palestinian terror that necessitated an Israeli response.

Who turned off the lights?

Were the power cuts and Palestinian demonstrations staged by Hamas in coordination with the Arab media? Calev Ben David of the Jerusalem Post wonders:

Indeed, so ready was Al-Jazeera with live coverage of candle-bearing Palestinian children and immediate reaction from across the Arab world, that Israeli officials said Tuesday they strongly suspect the Arab news network had coordinated its coverage in advance with the Hamas leadership.

“They were so prepared, it’s hard to believe they didn’t know this was going to happen,” said the official. “Although it’s already dark in Gaza by 6 p.m., they waited two hours to shut their generator down so that the lights going out in Gaza could be carried live on Al-Jazeeera during prime-time viewing.”

Writing in the same paper, Amir Mizroch notes:

The footage was powerful and unforgettable: thousands of people gathered to light candles in a Gaza City plunged into darkness. The possibility that Hamas itself had switched off the lights in the densely populated city to create the impression of an urgent humanitarian crisis was likely not considered by many watching the broadcast.

Naturally, he continued, many viewers associated the darkness with Israel’s decision to reduce fuel shipments. But the media downplayed the fact that Israel’s Ruttenberg power station in Ashkelon was still streaming electricity into Gaza and that there had been no Israeli action that shut the city’s lights off.

Hamas continued to manipulate a compliant media for its own ends. As the Jerusalem Post reported:

On at least two occasions this week, Hamas staged scenes of darkness as part of its campaign to end the political and economic sanctions against the Gaza Strip, Palestinian journalists said Wednesday.

In the first case, journalists who were invited to cover the Hamas government meeting were surprised to see Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and his ministers sitting around a table with burning candles.

In the second case on Tuesday, journalists noticed that Hamas legislators who were meeting in Gaza City also sat in front of burning candles.

But some of the journalists noticed that there was actually no need for the candles because both meetings were being held in daylight.

Clearly visible in the background are drawn curtains blocking the sunlight. This, however, didn’t stop Reuters spinning a different story with photo captions such as the one below:

If some journalists saw that they were being manipulated, why was it only the Jerusalem Post that reported this? Were these journalists really so lacking in integrity that they preferred to play along with the deception?

A ’spontaneous breakout’?

Typical of many media’s explanation of events was The Daily Telegraph’s:

The wall fell after a nearly week-long Israeli blockade of fuel and humanitarian aid into Gaza, a response to a week of heavy Qassam rocket attacks on Israeli towns after Israeli air strikes killed the son of a senior Hamas leader and 18 other people.

In fact, as McClatchy News discovered:

They had apparently been planning the attack for weeks. With the knowledge of locals, militants had spent weeks methodically using blow torches to cut along the bottom of the 30-foot-tall corrugated iron wall along the Egyptian border.

A Palestinian guard also told The Times of London that he saw people surreptitiously working to undermine the wall “for months.”

‘Starving’ Palestinians and a humanitarian crisis?

Hamas and the media conveyed the distinct impression of a humanitarian crisis as Gaza’s Palestinians ’starved’. Many media reported the closure of bakeries due to shortages of power and supplies. However, a Palestinian Authority official interviewed by the Jerusalem Post:

accused Hamas of ordering owners of bakeries to keep their businesses closed for the second day running to create a humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. “Hamas is preventing people from buying bread,” he said. “They want to deepen the crisis so as to serve their own interests.”

The official said that contrary to Hamas’s claims, there is enough fuel and flour to keep the bakeries in the Gaza Strip operating for another two months. “Hamas members have stolen most of the fuel in the Gaza Strip to fill their vehicles,” he said.

In addition, hospitals were said to be dangerously low on fuel, putting patients’ lives at risk. Was this also a result of Hamas actions? CAMERA quotes the independent Palestinian news agency Maan report of Dec 6, 2007:

The Palestinian health ministry of the Ramallah-based caretaker government said on Thursday that “Hamas militias” have looted the fuel stores destined for hospital vehicles in the Gaza Strip.

A statement released by the health ministry said that fuel from the European hospital in the Gaza Strip had been stolen by the director of the hospital drivers to supply the Hamas-affiliated Executive Force.

The statement explained that the fuel reserve had been supplied by the ministry to enable the hospital to continue working for as long as possible.

McClatchy News Jerusalem bureau chief Dion Nissenbaum even states:

Israel is pumping in some fuel for Gaza’s only power plant and offering some diesel, but Palestinians are actually refusing to accept the small shipments of diesel to protest Israel’s policies.

The Christian Science Monitor comments on Gazan ‘hunger’:

While starvation has not been a problem there – most of the strip’s residents receive food aid from the UN – it’s proved a powerful idea in the propaganda war over Gaza’s fate.

Will the media relent?

Some media will not admit that they have been manipulated by Hamas. Others prefer to stick to their rigid analysis where Israel bears sole responsibility for the plight of the Palestinians and any related crises.

Are the cracks starting to appear however? The Washington Post, for example, recognizes the new reality:

In fact, as Mr. Mubarak well knows, no one is starving in Gaza — though food, fuel and cigarettes are much cheaper across the border…. Hamas took advantage of the blockade first by arranging for sympathetic Arab media to document the “humanitarian crisis,” then by daring Egypt to use force against Palestinian civilians portrayed as Israel’s victims.

Its ultimate goal, stated publicly yesterday by Damascus-based leader Khaled Meshal, is to force Egypt to permanently reopen the border in cooperation with Hamas; that would greatly diminish Israel’s ability to respond to rocket attacks with economic sanctions, and it would undermine the rival Palestinian leadership of Mahmoud Abbas.

Sadly, as is so often the case, the damage to Israel has already been done as a result of the media’s willingness to buy into the Hamas propaganda. As Amir Mizroch says:

What is obvious is that Hamas was thinking on its feet, being proactive, initiating campaigns tailor-made for powerful media images and taking full advantage of the opportunities that presented themselves.

Please start the fightback to restore some credibility to the reporting of the situation in Gaza. Write to your local media - point out how Hamas has propagandized for its own ends at the expense of its own people and remind the media of the continued suffering of Sderot.

Full contact details of many media outlets can be found on HonestReporting’s website.

 

HonestReporting. com

juin 21st, 2008

Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
at the Israel Intelligence Heritage
& Commemoration Center (IICC)
An increase in attacks on Christian and
institutions identified with the West in
the Gaza Strip. Hamas, which controls
the radical Islamic entity in the Strip,
pays lip-service to condemning the
attacks but does not take effective steps
to stop them.
The damage done to the YMCA library by a bomb on February 15, 2008
(www.arabic.rnw.nl).
2
Overview
1. Since Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in June 2007 incitement and attacks against Christian
institutions and those identified as Western have increased, and have included churches,
Christian and UN schools, the American International School, libraries, Internet cafes, etc.
Recent incidents were the detonation of bombs in Gaza City near a school run by nuns and at
the entrance to a fast-food restaurant.
2. There are approximately 3,500 Christians living in the Gaza Strip, mainly in the Zeitun, al-
Daraj and Sheikh Radwan neighborhoods of Gaza City. Most of them are professionals or
businessmen and their socio-economic status is higher than that of the other residents. The
tiny Christian minority under the Hamas administration in the Gaza Strip lives in daily fear and
prefers to tone down its holidays and religious and cultural activities, while some of them even
consider leaving the Gaza Strip.
3. Moreover, institutions identified as Christian or with Western culture have been attacked by
radical Islamic elements, some of them affiliated with the global jihad which seek to prevent
the influence of Western ideas and to enforce strict Islamic codes on the daily life of the Gaza
Strip. The institutions also serve as a kind of punching bag to protest perceived slights to
Islam, such as the Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad.
A Christian family leaving the Gaza Strip to celebrate Christmas (Al-Ayyam, December 25, 2007).
4. The attitude of the ruling Hamas administration toward the attacks on the Christian and
Western institutions is ambivalent. On the one hand, Hamas strives to enforce an Islamic
code on the lives of the Gaza Strip residents and to increase it’s control over the infiltration of
3
Western ideas.1 High-level Hamas activists incite the residents against Christianity and the
West.2
5. A result of that ambivalence is the way Hamas has tackled the attacks, appointed
“investigation committees” and paid lip-service to expressing solidarity with the Christian
community. On the practical level, however, Hamas has preferred not to confront radical
Islamic elements in that regard. So far it is unknown whether the perpetrators of any of the
attacks have been caught and tried. In our assessment, the lack of effective action by Hamas
encourages the radical Islamic elements and enables the attacks to continue.
6. Abu Mazen’s Palestinian Authority and its media have condemned the attacks. On June 20,
2007 Abu Mazen gave a speech accusing Hamas of vandalizing churches when they took over
the Gaza Strip. After the May 16, 2008 attack on the school run by nuns, the Presidential
Committee for Christian Affairs in the Gaza Strip issued a public condemnation stating that
“the repeated attacks in on national institutions in the Gaza Strip [since the Hamas takeover],
especially Christian [institutions], have become a source of concern for the [PA’s] presidency
and for the entire Palestinian people (Al-Quds, May 17, 2008).
1 For further information see our August 31, 2007 Bulletin entitled “Since Hamas took over the Gaza Strip, it has
intensified its activities to impose an Islamic social code” at http://www.terrorisminfo.
org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/islamization_e.htm.
2 Conspicuous was the the Friday sermon given by Sheikh Yunis al-Astal, a Hamas member of the Palestinian
Legislative Council, broadcast by Al-Aqsa TV on April 11, 2008. He said that Islam would soon conquer Rome, “the
capital of the Catholics, or Crusaders,” which would then become “an advanced post for Islamic conquests which will
spread through Europe in its entirety, and then will turn to the two Americas and even Eastern Europe” (MEMRI
Special Dispatch No. 1885, April 14, 2008).
4
Appendix I
Attacks against Christian and Westernidentified
institutions in the Gaza Strip
1. Attacks against Christian and Western institutions have risen since Hamas took over the
Gaza Strip. In recent months there were several such incidents, the latest of which were
bombs which were blown up at the entrance of a fast-food restaurant in the center of Gaza
City on May 18 and near a school run by nuns on May 16.
2. The school attacked was the Rahabat al-Wardia school. It has a student body of 500, 450
of whom are Muslims. There are 35 employees, 25 of whom are Muslims. The school was
attacked because its students are exposed to Western culture, which is different from the
ideology radical Islamic elements seek to enforce in the Gaza Strip. In another example,
radical Islamic elements opposed to Western values and ideas have recently criticized the
summer camps run by international institutions because they are coeducational and the
participants absorb messages opposed to what they consider the values of Islam.
Pallbearers carrying the coffin of Rami Ayad, an employee of the Bible Society in the Gaza Strip, who
was abducted from his home and shot to death (Al-Ayyam, October 8, 2007).
3. The following is a list of the more notable attacks against Christian and Western institutions
in the Gaza Strip during the past year.
i) On May 18, 2008, a large IED exploded at the entrance to a fast-food restaurant
near Al-Quds Open University in the center of Gaza City. The restaurant was completely
destroyed. According to the owner, it was the second time his establishment had been
attacked (Ma’an News Agency, May 18). Hamas’s reaction was unclear.
5
ii) On May 16, 2008, an IED exploded in the Rahabat al-Wardia school run by nuns in
the Tel al-Hawa neighborhood of Gaza City. Hamas condemned the incident and a call
was made to the police to bring the criminals to justice. The previous year, when
Hamas took over the Gaza Strip, the school was subjected to thefts and an arson
attack.
iii) On April 3, 2008, a monument in the Gaza Strip’s foreign nationals’ cemetery was
blown up. Hamas promised to investigate.
iv) On February 15, 2008, the “Army of Islam in the Land of Ribat,” a network
headed by Mumtaz Dughmush,3 broke into the YMCA library in Gaza City and set off a
bomb which caused extensive damage. The Hamas police condemned the event, calling
it “a criminal act” and promising to investigate. The Hamas security forces detained a
number of Army of Islam operatives but released them shortly thereafter following a
threat that force would be used to free them otherwise. A meeting was held after the
event attended by senior Hamas figures met with senior Christian figures to express
solidarity
v) On January 10, 2008, the so-called “Army of the Believers — the Al-Qaeda
Organization in Palestine,” attacked the International School in Beit Lahia twice.4
Vehicles were burned and equipment was stolen. According to a statement issued two
days later, the school was accused of spreading polytheism and hatred for Islam. The
PA led by Abu Mazen condemned the attacks. On February 17 an editorial in the London
based Al-Quds al-Arabi called upon Hamas to uncover the identity of the perpetrators
and bring them to justice.
vi) On December 31, 2007, the so-called “Friends of the Sunnah Bayt al-Maqdis”
issued a manifesto on the Pal-today Website, affiliated with the PIJ, threatening to
attack anyone who participated in New Year’s Eve celebrations. The Hamas response
was unclear.
vii) On October 6, 2007, elements linked to Hamas abducted Rami Khadr Ayad from
his home and shot him to death; he was Christian who worked for the Holy Bible
Society. The Hamas administration condemned the murder and opened an investigation
whose results are so far unknown. Muslims in the Gaza Strip expressed their solidarity
with the victim’s family.
3 A terrorist organization affiliated with the global jihad, in effect a branch of Al-Qaeda in the Gaza Strip.
4 For further information see our January 14, 2008 Bulletin entitled “The “Army of the Believers—the Al-Qaeda
Organization in Palestine” has claimed responsibility for two attacks on the American International School in Gaza” at
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/al_qaeda_e.htm.
6
viii) On June 19, 2007, during the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip Hamas
operatives attacked and vandalized a monastery and church.5 On June 20 Abu Mazen
spoke before the Palestinian Legislative Council and used strong language to describe
Hamas’s takeover of the Gaza Strip. He said, among other things, “Even the Christian
churches did not escape [from Hamas]. They looted and burned a church in Gaza [City],
one of the oldest churches in Palestine…”6
ix) On April 21, 2007, elements linked to the global jihad attacked the American
International School in Gaza City.
x) On April 15, 2007, a group calling itself “The Swords of Truth in the Land of Ribat”
set off bombs in two Internet cafes and a store selling Christian books, causing damage.
5 That was not the first time Hamas operatives attacked a church. There was a similar incident on September 23,
2006.
6 On June 20 a column by Yussef al-Qazaz appeared in the PA’s organ, Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda entitled “Crime Comes to
the Churches.” It described how Hamas operatives burned a church library and attacked a school run by nuns.
7
Appendix II
The Christian community in the Gaza Strip
Background information
1. The Christian community in the Gaza Strip numbers about 3,500 of a total population of
1,400,000 Sunni Muslims. Most of them live in Gaza City in five neighborhoods: Zeitun, Al-
Daraj, Sheikh Radwan, Rimal and Tel al-Hawa. The most prominent Christian families are the
Tarazi, Khuri, Muslem, Ayad, Hakura, al-Siagh, Farah, al-Tawil, al-Saraf and Ghatas families.
2. The Christians have a representative in Hamas’s Palestinian Legislative Council, Fuad Kamal
Yaakub al-Tawil, who is supported by Hamas.
3. A small part of the Christian community lived in Gaza before 1948. They possessed houses,
real-estate and businesses. Their socio-economic status was higher than that of other Gaza
Strip inhabitants
4. Most of the Christians living there now came as refugees from the city of Ramle during
Israel’s War of Independence. They bought land and houses but nevertheless the socioeconomic
status was lower than that of the original Christian residents. Some of them lived in
the Shati refugee camp where they were given land by the Egyptian government on which
they built houses and a church. Another wave of Christians arrived with the establishment of
the PA in 1994, when PLO activists returned to the Gaza Strip.
The Christian educational system
5. There are five Christian schools in the Gaza Strip, four of them Catholic and one of them
Orthodox Christian. Most of the students and staff are Muslim:
i) The Holy Family School: 700 students in 12 grades, 100 Christian and 600 Muslim.
ii) The Latin Patriarch School: 550 students from kindergarten through high school,
40 Christian and 510 Muslim.
iii) The Rahabat al-Wardia School: 500 students, from kindergarten through the
ninth grade, 50 Christian and 450 Muslim.
8
iv) The Sisters of Love Kindergarten: 120 children, 5 Christian and 115 Muslim.
v) The Orthodox Christian School: 500 students from kindergarten through the
ninth grade, 100 Christian and 400 Muslim.
Christian associations and societies
6. There are a number of Christian associations and societies operating in the Gaza Strip,
most of them dealing with vocational training, education and humanitarian aid to all local
residents:
i) The Middle East Church Council: provides medical and vocational training for
Christians and Muslims. The Council operates a number of medical clinics. The Council
receives support from churches around the world.
ii) The YMCA: provides educational services and organizes social activities and
vocational training courses.
iii) The Episcopalian Church Society: operates the Al-Ahli hospital, a medical center
with a large library.
iv) The Society of Christ: provides medical services and runs an infirmary.
v) The Papal Delegation Society: deals primarily with building Christian institutions.
vi) The Catholic Relief Service: provides agricultural aid
9
Appendix III
Pictures of the results of attacks
American School in Beit Lahia school bus torched
(Info-live Website, January 13, 2008

juin 21st, 2008

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs

Institute for Contemporary Affairs

founded jointly with the Wechsler Family Foundation

 

 Vol. 8, No.4    19 June 2008

The Hamas Interest in the Tahdiya (Temporary Truce) with Israel

Jonathan Dahoah Halevi

  • Hamas regards the temporary cease-fire as a tahdiya and not a hudna. A tahdiya - “a period of calm” - is used by Hamas to describe a simple cease-fire. A hudna implies recognition of the other party’s actual existence, without acknowledging its legitimacy.

  • In an interview with Al-Jazeera (April 26, 2008), Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal clarified that for Hamas, a tahdiya is “a tactic in conflict management.” He added that it “is not unusual for the resistance…to escalate sometimes and to retreat a bit sometimes as the tide does….The tahdiya creates a formulation that will force Israel…to remove the siege…and if it happens it will be a remarkable achievement.”

  • Official sources in Israel have explained that Hamas’ interest in a lull in the fighting is a result of its “distress.” But the organization did not experience “distress.” Hamas has introduced and maintained law and order in Gaza, strengthened its overall control, suppressed opposition, and achieved broad popular support for its policies.

  • An important objective for Hamas is winning the Palestinian presidential election, which will be held when Mahmoud Abbas finishes his term of office in December. The lull will permit Hamas to prepare the field to take over from Abbas. Hamas is liable to claim that, according to Palestinian law, administrative authority should be passed on to the chairman of the parliament, who is a Hamas leader, or should be decided by the parliament itself, where Hamas has an overwhelming majority.

  • One diplomatic consequence of the tahdiya will be increasing pressure on Israel to accept a future reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah. That could lead to increasing demands on Israel to negotiate a permanent status arrangement with a joint Hamas-Fatah government, while Hamas remains committed to its political program of the elimination of Israel.

  • The cease-fire also grants Hamas a golden opportunity to expand its military build-up for the next round of terror and violence. Emulating Hizbullah’s strategy, Hamas is striving to acquire longer-range and more destructive missiles to be used for deterrence and as a sword on Israel’s neck.

 

After eight years of armed Intifada, countless Palestinian terrorist attacks, and more than 7,000 rockets fired against civilians in Israel, the Egyptian government succeeded in securing an agreement by Israel and Hamas for a cease-fire that took effect at 6:00 a.m. on June 19, 2008. Officially, the Israeli government argues that there is no understanding with Hamas, but only with Egypt. However, that formalism is not necessarily the perception of the international community.

 

The main terms of the unwritten agreement include the following:

·        All Gaza-Israel violence stops for six months. After three days, Israel will ease its blockade of Gaza, allowing more vital supplies in.

·        A week later, Israel will further ease restrictions at cargo crossings.

·        In the final stage, talks will be conducted about opening the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt and for a prisoner exchange to free IDF soldier Gilad Shalit, held by Hamas for two years.(1)

 

Hamas regards the temporary cease-fire as a tahdiya and not a hudna. The difference between the two Arabic terms is substantial. Hudna means “truce,” which is more concrete than tahdiya - “a period of calm” - which Hamas often uses to describe a simple cease-fire. In traditional Islamic thought, a hudna is negotiated between an Islamic entity and a non-Islamic entity, but it can be reversed the moment the Islamic side has gained sufficient strength to resume fighting. Nevertheless, a hudna implies recognition of the other party’s actual existence, without acknowledging its legitimacy. 

 

A tahdiya has less standing than a hudna. Khaled Mashaal, Hamas’ leader, and his deputy in leadership, Musa Abu Marzouq, elaborated in recent months their interpretation of a tahdiya. In an interview with Al-Jazeera (April 26, 2008), Mashaal clarified that for Hamas, a tahdiya is “a tactic in conflict management and a phase in the framework of the resistance [meaning all forms of struggle].” He added that it “is not unusual for the resistance…to escalate sometimes and to retreat a bit sometimes as the tide does….The tahdiya creates a formulation that will force Israel…to remove the siege…and if it happens it will be a remarkabl e achievement….We are speaking of a tactical tahdiya….As long as there is occupation, there is no other way but resistance.”(2)

 

When asked about Mashaal’s “tactical tahdiya,” Musa Abu Marzouq explained that “the tahdiya is not a strategy or a goal itself, but it is a tactical step in this conflict….Our goal is to liberate our land and to bring about the return of our people. The resistance is a tool to reach this end.”(3)

 

Official sources in Israel have explained that Hamas’ interest in a lull in the fighting is a result of the “distress” it has suffered from the extended blockade of Gaza.(4) Israel’s policy did in fact cause difficulties for Hamas, but these hardships do not explain Hamas’ strategic motives for the lull. The organization did not experience “distress” - neither in a strengthening of the opposition to the Hamas administration, nor in an increase of popular protests against it. In fact, the opposite is true. Even the official Israeli evaluation of Hamas’ first year of rule since its military takeover in Jun e 2007 suggests that Hamas has managed to introduce and maintain law and order in the Gaza Strip, strengthen its overall control, suppress opposition, and achieve broad popular support for its policies.

 

 

Hamas’ Motivation: Legitimacy and Recognition

Hamas’ motives have nothing to do with “distress,” but rather with “opportunities” - that is, the objectives it seeks to attain in the international arena and especially in its own internal political arena. First, the lull in the fighting is meaningless for Hamas; it is not a cease-fire or a truce, but a temporary“ cessation of hostilities with Israel. Next, Hamas is not committed to continuing the lull when the six months run out, and it can use any excuse it chooses to continue its terrorist campaign: Israeli building in the settlements, Israeli measures taken in Jerusalem, or IDF anti-terror measures in the West Bank. Hamas can also send other Palestinian organizations to do its dirty work.

The tahdiya agreement for a lull is an important achievement for Hamas. Hamas will gain the recognition it wants as the legitimate ruler of the Gaza Strip. Despite the fact that the Israeli government has defined Hamas-ruled Gaza as a hostile entity, Israel agreed to the continuation of trade with it, and even recognized the hostile entity’s authority to operate the Rafah crossing. Hamas regards that as immensely important and wants to exploit it as a lever to open the door to official relations with Europe, and to have itself removed from the various lists of terrorist organizations.

Another important objective for Hamas is winning the Palestinian presidential election, which will be held when Mahmoud Abbas finishes his term of office in December. Hamas wants to present itself in the contest as a legitimate ruling body worthy of inheriting the presidency. High-ranking Hamas figures have already stated that the organization will not recognize Abbas’ authority as president after December 2008.(5)

 

Hamas is liable to claim that, according to Palestinian law, administrative authority should be passed on to the chairman of the parliament, who is a Hamas leader, or should be decided by the parliament itself, where Hamas has an overwhelming majority. In other words, for Hamas, the lull in the fighting will permit the movement to prepare the field to take over from Abbas, thereby complementing its military takeover of Gaza. Hamas’ challenge is also the motivation behind Abbas’ desire to talk to Hamas about reaching an understanding about new elections, and it explains why Hamas has rejected the suggestion.

 

 

Main Implications of the Tahdiya

 

Hamas wants to exploit the lull in the fighting to upgrade its status in the international community in order to gain legitimacy for its campaign for the presidency after Abbas’ term is over in December 2008.

 

The cease-fire grants Hamas a golden opportunity to expand its military build-up for the next round of terror and violence. Emulating Hizbullah’s strategy, Hamas is striving to acquire longer-range and more destructive missiles to be used for deterrence and as a sword on Israel’s neck.

 

Israel has acknowledged Hamas, albeit unwillingly, as the de facto ruling power in Gaza. Israel’s acceptance of the cease-fire is a blow to the international war on terror and gives immunity to Hamas and other terrorist organizations in Gaza, including al-Qaeda affiliates.

 

Another diplomatic consequence of the tahdiya will be increasing pressure on Israel to accept a reconciliation agreement between Hamas and Fatah in the future. That could lead to increasing demands on Israel to negotiate a permanent status arrangement with the joint Hamas-Fatah government, while Hamas remains committed to its political program of the elimination of Israel. It is important to recall that the entire Israeli-Palestinian negotiating track since the convening of the Annapolis conference was premised on the exclusion of Hamas and the ultimate achievement of an agreement between the Israeli government and the government of Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah alone.

 

Delaying the release of Cpl. Gilad Shalit to a later phase of the Israel-Hamas arrangement can have a demoralizing effect in Israel, for it sends a message that the recovery of captured soldiers is not the highest priority.

 

*     *     *

 

Notes

 

1. http://www.startribune.com/world/20167939.html?location_refer+World:highlightModules:3

2. http://aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/41C8CBD6-5D3A-4F4B-B952-CFBF766D6B6F.htm? wbc_purpose=basic_current_current_current_Current

3. http://www.alwatan.sy/dindex.php?idn=32872

4. http://news.walla.co.il/?w=/22/1291534

5. http://www.al-sharq.com/DisplayArticle.aspx?xf=2008,June,article_20080608_103 &id=worldtoday&sid=arabworld

 

*     *     *

 

Lt. Col. (res.) Jonathan D. Halevi is a senior researcher of the Middle East and radical Islam at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He is a founder of the Orient Research Group Ltd. and is a former advisor to the Policy Planning Division of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

 

juin 21st, 2008

SPIEGEL ONLINE

SPIEGEL ONLINE

05/16/2008 04:30 PM

‘WIPE OUT THE JEWS’

Anti-Semitic Hate Speech in the Name of Islam

By Matthias Küntzel

Though most Muslims reject Islamism and its propaganda, anti-Semitic messages from satellite channels like the Hamas-run Al-Aqsa are helping to bring a message of hate and intolerance to Europe. The effects of such hate preaching can already be felt in Germany.

The Hamas satellite station Al-Aqsa recently used a Mickey Mouse clone to teach Muslim children -- in Gaza and Europe -- to hate Jews.

REUTERS

Sowing the seeds of hate: The Hamas satellite station Al-Aqsa recently used a Mickey Mouse clone to teach Muslim children — in Gaza and Europe — to hate Jews.

“Sanabel, what do you want to do to help the Al-Aqsa Mosque?” Farfur asks on the children’s program of Hamas’s Al-Aqsa television station. “We want to fight.” “And what else?” “Wipe out the Jews.” Now Farfur, the cartoon character on Hamas’s children’s television program, is satisfied. Farfur is a carbon copy of Walt Disney’s Mickey Mouse, but the Hamas version does something that Mickey would never do: He entertains children while propagating the murder of Jews.

International protests forced Hamas to take its Disney clone out of circulation. Al-Aqsa complied, but promptly turned Farfur’s departure into an anti-Semitic statement: Farfur was clubbed to death by an Israeli official. Then the girl hosting the program turned to the camera and said: “You’ve seen how the Jews killed Farfur as a martyr. What do you want to say to the Jews?” A three-year-old girl named Shaima called into the show to say: “We don’t like Jews, because they are dogs! We will fight them!” “Oh, Shaima, you’re right,” the girl in the studio replied, “the Jews are criminals and our enemies.”

Farfur’s appearances are typical of Hamas’s anti-Semitic propaganda, which the organization also exports to Germany via satellite, hoping to breed new generations of fanatical anti-Semites and suicide bombers.

The Hamas station, founded in 2006, is modeled on the Hezbollah station in neighboring Lebanon, al-Manar. Al-Manar’s children’s program shows children wearing explosive belts and images of dying Israeli soldiers, with triumphant chants as background music. Cartoons depict scenes like that of a child blowing himself up near Israeli soldiers, or of a smiling boy flying toward Israel on a missile. Adult viewers can enjoy video clips that use inspirational graphics and rousing music to glorify the act of committing a suicide bombing, while the evening lineup offers family entertainment with a series of films based on the classic anti-Semitic forgery “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

In late 2004, France banned the broadcasting of al-Manar through the European Eutelsat satellite system, citing the station’s anti-Semitic content. Nevertheless, messages of hate were still being broadcast into the living rooms of Muslims in Germany via satellites controlled by Saudi Arabia and Egypt, ArabSat and NileSat. Exposure to this programming was apparently not without consequences.

Rabbi Zalman Gurevitch was wearing a traditional black robe when he left his synagogue in Frankfurt’s Westend neighborhood on Sept. 7, 2007. It was the Sabbath. According to the police report, he encountered a 22-year-old German of Afghan descent “spontaneously and coincidentally” a short time later. It was early evening and the man, shouting “You shit Jew, I’m going to kill you,” plunged a knife into the rabbi’s abdomen. Gurevitch was recognizable as a Jew. He survived, thanks to luck and emergency surgery.

Although this attack was an isolated incident, it is hard to overlook how hatred imported from Beirut and Gaza resurfaces in the form of daily acts of anti-Semitism in schools and athletic clubs, on streets and in the subway. Young children raised to be anti-Semitic are already using the phrase “You Jew!” as a derogatory expression in kindergartens and on playgrounds. Schoolchildren berate their teachers, calling them Jew dogs, for not offering Sharia-compatible instruction, and Jewish schoolchildren are attacked and feel compelled to switch to Berlin’s Jewish high school and to hide the insignia of their Jewish faith — the yarmulke and the Star of David — when in public.

Neo-Nazi sentiments were behind the majority of anti-Semitic incidents reported in 2006. At the same time, however, the number of anti-Semitic criminal offences committed by Muslims jumped from 33 to 88.

In 2007 the German Interior Ministry published a study on the worldviews of “Muslims in Germany,” the most comprehensive of its kind to date, which confirmed this trend. According to the study, “anti-Semitic attitudes were found among young Muslims far more often than among non-Muslim immigrants or domestic non-Muslims.” The study cited examples of Muslim students to illustrate that this anti-Semitism cannot be dismissed as the product of an underdog attitude within marginalized social groups, but instead represents an ideological way of thinking. “The pervasiveness of sweeping anti-Semitic prejudices among Muslim students was also noticeable,” the study pointed out. “Such prejudices, expressed indirectly by slightly more than one-third and in extreme form by about 10 percent of students, are significantly more common than anti-Christian sentiments.”

What is the source of this profound hatred, which stations like al-Aqsa and al-Manar are spreading and one in 10 of the Muslim students surveyed embraces? The Middle East conflict is often cited as a reason, but this is too simplistic. Hostility toward Jews has existed since Islam came into being. In its charter, Hamas quotes the Prophet Muhammad as saying: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight Jews and kill them. Then, the Jews will hide behind rocks and trees, and the rocks and trees will cry out: ‘O Muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him.” Through the use of such language, the hatred of Jews is given a religious justification.

Nazi Germany entered the picture in the 20th century. The Nazis, hoping to use early Islamic hostility toward Jews for their own ends, paid substantial sums of money to support the Muslim Brotherhood’s anti-Jewish campaigns in Egypt. And just as they had radicalized widespread Christian anti-Semitism in Europe, the Nazis did their utmost to radicalize the latent anti-Judaism that had originated in early Islam.

While everything Jewish was considered evil in early Islam, everything evil was now being labeled as Jewish, from wars and revolutions to the drug trade and the decline of moral values. Between 1938 and 1945, the Nazis’ radio station broadcast its lies about a supposed Jewish world conspiracy into the Islamic world every evening. The professionally produced programs were broadcast in Arabic, Persian and Turkish, and were very popular. Thus, it comes as no surprise that the Hamas charter has also adopted this legacy.

The Jews, we read in Article 22, “stood behind the French Revolution, the Communist Revolution and most of the revolutions we hear about… They stood behind World War I … There is no war going on anywhere without them having their finger in it.”

Whether in the case of Muhammad or here, in both cases Hamas used sources to justify its hatred of the Jews that are older than Israel. But once someone has fallen for this demonizing delusion, he will find his anti-Jewish concept of the enemy confirmed in everything that an Israeli government does or fails to do. What is more, those who hold Jews responsible for all the world’s ills will paint the Jewish state as the root of all evil. Following Hamas’s example, they will celebrate or deny the Holocaust, even in Berlin.

Teachers in the German capital are sometimes confronted with Muslim students who expressly use the Holocaust to justify their sympathies for the Nazis (”I like Hitler; he did the right thing with the Jews”), refusing to take part in school trips to concentration camp memorials. During one excursion to the German Historical Museum, a group of Muslim youth gathered in front of a replica of a gas chamber in Auschwitz and applauded.

Can we blame Israel for the mindset that leads to such activities? Perhaps it would be more apt to conclude that the waves of hatred that the Nazis’ shortwave radio transmitter once broadcast into the Arab world are now returning in the form of a delayed echo.

Building Street Cred for the Islamist Movement

Most Muslims reject Islamism and its propaganda. According to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, only about one percent of Muslims living in Germany are members of Islamist organizations whose political objectives include anti-Semitism. But the non-organized potential for radicalization is significantly greater. According to the “Muslims in Germany” study, between eight and 12 percent of Muslims hold anti-Western and anti-democratic views. “Attitudes ranging from strongly fundamentalist to openness to Islamism” are found among younger Muslims, according to the study. One of the respondents, the authors write, articulated a “desire for a young political avant-garde,” which, the respondent said, must “take matters into its own hands.”

Following the demise of the socialist bloc and the decimation of protest movements with a secular orientation, such a rebellious impulse does in fact shape the Islamist movement into an anti-Western avant-garde of sorts. As the only adversary of the global world order, it possesses an ideology, a lot of money and supporters worldwide. Advertising for the Islamist cause has used pop culture with as little inhibition as Hamas has unscrupulously resorted to a Hollywood cartoon character to recruit children. Trend-conscious clothing, music and lifestyle advertising bring “street credibility” to the Islamist mission. Online shops, like the Hamas-affiliated portal Islamicstatewear.com, sell T-shirts with expressly religious messages, like “Islam! Submit!,” “I love my Prophet” and “State University of Mecca,” while musicians like the rapper “Ammar114″ (his name is based on the 114 suras of the Koran) use their raps to promote their version of Islam.

Other Muslim rappers portray themselves as representatives of a “Jihad Generation” and pepper their “intifada rap” with anti-Semitism of the worst kind. “Zyklon Beatz,” a Berlin rap group, released a CD in 2006 with lyrics describing Jews as animals and demonizing them as devils in human form. Rapper Bushido, who won the prestigious ECHO Music Award in February 2008 and was broadcast live on RTL as Germany’s best hip hop artist, stylizes himself as a Muslim assassin: “I am a Taliban … I am this terrorist young people believe in … I am King Bushido, and my second name is Mohammed. And I have set your city on fire.”

In a rap video placed on the Internet, a Lebanese man living in Berlin chants: “Kill every Jewish pig, the Jahudis are unclean. They should all die and they aren’t worth our tears. Arabs like us rule.” Within a few weeks, his video, which translates Hezbollah’s and Hamas’s universes of hatred into a form more accessible to youth, had provoked hundreds of comments, most of them enthusiastic.

But one criticism of the German-language hip hop scene — that such statements no longer provoke a scandal — also applies to the German public at large. While the anti-Semitism coming from the extremist right wing attracts attention, and for good reason, there is too little awareness of anti-Semitism articulated by Muslims. For some, hatred of Jews is as much a part of the Middle Eastern world as water pipes and mosques. Others say nothing because they see Muslims mainly as victims. Still others gloss over Islamic anti-Semitism as an understandable reaction to the Middle East conflict, while organizations like the Left Party even see potential common ground with the Islamist movement.

In 2003, the German Interior Ministry banned Hizb ut-Tahrir, an Arab anti-Semitic organization, and in 2005 it ordered Yeni Akit, a Turkish anti-Semitic publishing house, to shut down. And in 2007, the Interior Ministry supported projects to combat anti-Semitism among Muslim youth. But the Foreign Ministry has consistently undermined all of these efforts by accepting the importation of anti-Semitic propaganda through Saudi Arabian and Egyptian satellite broadcasters.

Meanwhile, a rabbit named Assud has replaced Mickey Mouse on Hamas’s children’s program. “Why is your name Assud (lion) if you are a rabbit?” a girl asked in the broadcast on Feb. 8, 2008. “Because I, Assud, will clean up the Jews and devour them.” The girl nodded in agreement, and said: “May Allah’s will be done.”

Hamburg political scientist Matthias Küntzel, 53, is a member of the board of directors of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East. His recent book “Islamic anti-Semitism and German Politics,” was recently published by LIT Verlag.

URL:

RELATED SPIEGEL ONLINE LINKS:

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2008
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH

window.print();

Georges Malbrunot revient à la charge sur son obsession : la réintégration du Hezbollah au Liban, et du Hamas en « Palestine »

juin 9th, 2008

Le « quatrième pouvoir » en France, et l’Orient compliqué
7 juin 2008 - Par Simon Frajdenrajch, analyste

Dans sa dernière livraison au Figaro du 6 juin, Georges Malbrunot « grand reporter » au service Etranger du Figaro, revient à la charge sur son obsession : la réintégration du Hezbollah au Liban, et du Hamas en « Palestine » dans le jeu politique « international », comme si ces organisations dont l’emblème est une kalachnikov dans une main, et un coran dans l’autre, étaient politiquement fréquentables.

Par là, il nous prouve encore une fois qu’il est un agent zélé du quai d’Orsay, où il prend ses informations pseudo confidentielles, en se donnant des airs de nous exposer savamment une position que les analystes du Quai lui ont concoctée. Jusqu’où va cette connivence ?

Depuis les procès en diffamation à répétition que Charles Enderlin et sa maison mère, France 2, ont fait à de pauvres clampins qui ont osé mettre en doute la parole du « maître journaliste » Charles Enderlin, je ne me risquerai pas à avancer d’hypothèse. Mais les liens de dépendance apparaissent puissants.

Ainsi, après avoir titré son papier : « Sarkozy doit fixer un cap clair au Moyen-Orient », Malbrunot évoque le voyage que le Président accomplit aujourd’hui à Beyrouth, puis les 22 et 23 juin en Israël, et notre grand reporter fait mine de nous décrypter « l’Orient compliqué ». Il commence très honnêtement son pensum :

… « L’issue de la récente crise libanaise que le président vient spectaculairement célébrer à Beyrouth doit peu à la diplomatie française. Ses vainqueurs le Hezbollah chiite et ses parrains iranien et syrien ne sont pas ceux que la France soutenait. Est-ce à dire que Paris va réévaluer son appui à la majorité pro-occidentale du 14 mars, défaite par le mouvement chiite et ses alliés chrétiens ? Officiellement, il n’en est pas question. Pourtant, la diplomatie française va devoir tenir compte de la minorité de blocage, au sein du gouvernement libanais, que le Hezbollah pourra désormais brandir pour s’opposer à toute décision contraire à ses choix » …

Hélas, les choses se gâtent très rapidement : ayant introduit le rôle politique du Hezbollah, qui se serait refait une virginité après l’accord de Doha avec la majorité libanaise anti-syrienne, et grâce aux chausse-pied syrien et iranien, notre maître journaliste va oser des équivalences morales aussi spécieuses qu’improbables :

… « Entre morale et realpolitik, l’Élysée devra trancher. Heureusement, contrairement à Jacques Chirac (1), Nicolas Sarkozy prône « le dialogue avec tous les Libanais », y compris les anciens « terroristes » du Hezbollah.

Passons pudiquement sur le dialogue avec le Hezbollah que le président Chirac se serait interdit, alors qu’après le massacre de 58 parachutistes français à la caserne du Drakkar en 1982 par des miliciens du Hezbollah, et l’assassinat de l’ambassadeur de France à Beyrouth la même année, puis les enlèvements du journalistes français dans les années 1984-88, Chirac n’a pas craint de siéger à côté d’Hassan Nasrallah, hilare, incapable de jacter le moindre mot de français, au sommet de la francophonie à Beyrouth en 2002 [1]].

C’est alors que notre maître journaliste va porter l’estocade si bien préparée par les torreros du quai d’Orsay :

… « Pourquoi, alors, au nom de ce réalisme ne parlerait-on pas également aux islamistes palestiniens du Hamas ? Paris vient de le faire tout en démentant l’avoir fait. Problème de calendrier, avant la visite du chef de l’État en Israël. Exigence de discrétion rompue. Peut-être. Mais sur ce point aussi, les ambiguïtés doivent être levées. »…

La semaine dernière, sur une indiscrétion savamment dosée du Quai d’Orsay, l’ancien ambassadeur de France M. de la Messuzière avait révélé ses contacts « officieux » avec le Hamas, que Bernard Kouchner avait dû reconnaître tout en minimisant leur portée sur une grande radio nationale le lendemain matin : « ce sont des contacts, pas des relations » avait-il avoué. « On se touche mais on ne couche pas » comme le soulignait avec malice Pierre Lefèbvre.

Hélas pour nos amis du Quai, Tzipi Livni, ministre des affaires étrangères d’Israël, et sérieuse candidate à la succession d’Ehud Olmert, était de passage à Paris la semaine suivante : le président lui assura qu’il n’était pas question que la France noue des contacts avec le Hamas.

Le président Sarkozy se rend dans deux semaines en Israël, et il ne voulait pas de couac. Malbrunot et le quai d’Orsay croient que leur sortie sur rapprochement entre la France le Hamas n’était que prématurée.

De passage en Grèce hier, où il fut reçu comme un enfant du pays, le président Sarkozy n’a pas manqué d’évoquer ses racines du côté maternel, issues d’une riche famille juive de Salonique. Il n’oubliera sans doute pas que le Peuple juif, dignement représenté en Israël, est le Peuple de la mémoire…

[1] Rappelons au passage qu’à toutes les occasions où des hommes politiques français, de tous bords (Villepin, Sarkozy, Delanoe, …), veulent caresser les responsables de la communauté juive française dans le sens du poil, ils promettent la main sur le cœur qu’ils feront tout leur possible pour qu’Israël se joigne au Club de la Francophonie - ce qui serait amplement justifié puisque Israël compte un million de francophones sur 7,2 millions d’habitants, ce dont ne sauraient se vanter ni l’Albanie, ni même le Vietnam, membres du club ; mais hélas, hélas, il y a cette fichue règle de l’unanimité… Et comme précisément le Liban s’oppose à l’entrée d’Israël dans ce Club.

Ce petit jeu dure depuis des décennies : devinez quel(s) pays devrai(en)t se sentir contrit(s) ?

Dans le même ordre d’Idée, l’Algérie exige des « clarifications » sur la participation d’Israël, avant d’accepter de se joindre au projet d’« Union pour la Méditerranée », le nouveau machin voulu par Sarkozy sous l’impulsion de son mentor Claude Guéant.

Aussi réjouissons-nous : l’intransigeance haineuse de l’Algérie fera capoter un projet placé dans le droit fil du processus de Barcelone, promis à noyer l’Europe sous le flot de la rive Sud de la Méditerranée, où le respect des droits de l’homme, de l’égalité des sexes, de la liberté d’expression, de religion… sont broyés par l’islam dominant.

Gaza : Campagne de terreur contre les chrétiens et les occidentaux.

juin 9th, 2008

Campagne de terreur contre les chrétiens et les occidentaux.

Gaza : Campagne de terreur contre les chrétiens et les occidentaux.

A Gaza aussi, l’Islam montre sa tolérance et son profond respect pour les personnes appartenant aux autres religions. Depuis le désengagement Israélien de Gaza, cette bande de terre est “juderein”, en ce sens qu’il n’y a plus un seul juif qui puisse y vivre. Alors à présent c’est au tour des chrétiens de se voir indiqués la direction vers la sortie, avec “la valise ou le cercueil”.

Les experts rapportent que l’on assiste ces deux dernières années à une recrudescence à Gaza des attaques contre les chrétiens et les personnes perçues comme étant de culture occidentale, en particulier depuis la prise du pouvoir par le Hamas en juin 2007. Les cibles sont des églises, des écoles chrétiennes et de l’O.N.U., l’École Internationale Américaine, des bibliothèques et des cyber-cafés.

Le dernier incident date de samedi dernier, 31 mai, où des individus ont attaqué à l’arme à feu les gardiens de l’école Al-Manara, ont volé un véhicule appartenant à la Société Baptiste du Saint Livre, qui dirige cette école, et ont menacé le directeur. La direction du Hamas ne fait rien pour faire cesser les attaques et personne n’a été traduit en justice.

Implication du djihad international.

Un rapport de la Sûreté israélienne a établi qu’il y a eu augmentation du nombre des attaques contre les personnalités et les institutions chrétiennes, ainsi que celles assimilées aux valeurs occidentales. Ces attaques sont perpétrées par des éléments assimilés au djihad international et à l’islam radical. Ces deux dernières années des mouvements associés à Al-Qaïda ont assumé la responsabilité d’attaques contre des chrétiens et des institutions chrétiennes, dans le but ouvertement déclaré d’expulser les chrétiens hors de Gaza.

La communauté chrétienne de Gaza compte environ 3000 personnes. Voici la liste des dernières attaques en date contre les chrétiens, publiée par le Centre des Renseignement et de l’Information sur le Terrorisme du IICC ( Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center):

*
18 Mai 2008 : une bombe de forte intensité a explosé à l’entrée d’un fast-food près d’Al-Quds University dans le centre de la ville de Gaza. Le restaurant a été complètement détruit. Des groupes associés à Al-Qaida ont revendiqué la responsabilité des attaques avec l’objectif déclaré de conduire les chrétiens à quitter Gaza.
*
16 Mai 2008 : une bombe a explosé devant l’école Rahabat al-Wardia dirigée par des religieuses dans le quartier de Tel al-Hawa de la ville de Gaza. Le Hamas a condamné l’incident et a lancé un appel à la police pour arrêter les criminels. L’année précédente, lorsque le Hamas avait pris le contrôle de la bande de Gaza, l’école avait été sujet à des vols et à un incendie volontaire.
*
3 avril 2008 : un monument du cimetière des ressortissants étrangers de la bande de Gaza a été détruit par une bombe. Le Hamas a promis d’enquêter.
*
15 Février 2008 : Trois hommes armés de l’”armée de l’Islam sur la terre de Ribat”, un réseau dirigé par Mumtaz Dughmush, font irruption dans la bibliothèque du YMCA et déclenchent une bombe qui a causé d’importants dégâts. La police du Hamas a condamné , qualifiant l’attentat d’”acte criminel” et promettant d’enquêter. Les forces de sécurité du Hamas ont arrêté un certain nombre d’hommes de l’Armée de l’Islam mais les a libérés peu de temps après, suite à une menace de ces derniers d’employer la force pour les libérer. Après l’événement, de hauts responsables du Hamas ont exprimé leur solidarité avec la communauté chrétienne.
*
10 Janvier 2008 : un groupe appelé “armée des croyants - Al-Qaida en Palestine” a attaqué l’Ecole internationale de Beit Lahiya à deux reprises, incendiant des véhicules et volant du matériel. Selon une déclaration publiée deux jours plus tard, l’école était accusée de faire du polythéisme et de propager la haine de l’islam. Les attaques ont été organisée de manière à coïncider avec la visite du président américain George W. Bush en Israël.
*
31 Décembre 2007 : les «Amis de la Sunna Bayt al-Maqdis” ont publié un manifeste sur le site internet Pal-today, affilié au Jihad islamique, menaçant d’attaquer tous ceux qui ont participé aux célébrations du nouvel an chrétien.
*
6 Octobre 2007 : des militants liés au Hamas ont enlevé Rami Khadr Ayad à son domicile et l’ont abattu par balle. C’était un chrétien qui travaillait pour la Holy Bible Society. L’administration du Hamas a condamné le meurtre et a ouvert une enquête dont les résultats sont à ce jour inconnus.
*
19 Juin 2007 : lors de la prise par le Hamas de la bande de Gaza des hommes armés du Hamas ont attaqué et saccagé un monastère et l’église.
*
21 Avril 2007 : des éléments liés au djihad international ont attaqué l’ American International School de la ville de Gaza.
*
15 Avril 2007 : un groupe se faisant appeler “les épées de la vérité sur la terre de Ribat” a fait exploser des bombes dans deux cafés Internet et un magasin de vente de livres chrétiens, causant des dégâts.

Source


Article printed from :: Novopress.info Suisse: http://ch.novopress.info

URL to article: http://ch.novopress.info/?p=2031

L’Egypte construit un mur et change de ton à propos de la barrière d’Israël

juin 7th, 2008

L’Egypte construit un mur et change de ton à propos de la barrière d’Israël, David Schenker

 

Imprimer Envoyer à un ami

The Weekly Standard Vol. 13, n° 31, du 28 avril 2008

Texte anglais : “Egypt builds a wall and changes its tune on Israel’s barrier”.

Traduction française : Menahem Macina pour upjf.org

On a fait beaucoup de bruit autour de la barrière de sécurité, qui isole la Cisjordanie. Quand elle sera achevée, en 2010, cette barrière – qui suit approximativement la frontière entre Israël et le territoire palestinien – s’étendra sur quelque 805 km. Les Israéliens affirment que le but de cet ouvrage est de réduire les attentats terroristes contre l’Etat juif. Il y a peu de raisons de mettre la chose en doute : malgré un attentat, perpétré en mars, qui a tué huit étudiants d’un institut religieux juif de Jérusalem, les statistiques montrent que cette barrière et son homologue autour de Gaza sont efficaces.

Les habitants de la Cisjordanie condamnent l’ouvrage parce qu’il empiète sur le territoire palestinien d’avant 1967, qu’il limite la liberté de mouvement, et sépare les agriculteurs de leurs champs. Le Hamas, qui a pris le contrôle de la Bande de Gaza depuis juin 1967, décrit son territoire comme une « grande prison ». Jusqu’à récemment, l’Egypte comptait parmi les critiques bruyants. En 2003, le ministre des Affaires étrangères de l’époque, Ahmed Maher, décrivait l’ouvrage comme « défiant la légitimité internationale et l’opinion publique mondiale ».

Et tandis qu’Israël s’active rapidement à circonscrire hermétiquement sa menace côté Cisjordanie, les Palestiniens font face à la perspective d’un autre mur qui va les encercler. Toutefois, ce mur n’est pas construit par les Palestiniens, mais par l’Egypte, qui aspire à se protéger davantage de ses voisins palestiniens de Gaza.

Le Caire a toutes les raisons de se faire du souci. En janvier 2008, le Hamas a démoli la clôture de la frontière entre Gaza et l’Egypte, ce qui a permis à environ 700 000 Palestiniens – près de la moitié de la population de Gaza – de déferler dans le désert du Sinaï. Au début, Le Caire a considéré la brèche de Gaza comme une occasion de conforter sa bonne foi pro-palestinienne. Puis, la réalité s’est mise en place. L’Egypte, à ce qu’il semble, s’est inquiétée de ce que l’entrée des Palestiniens dans le Sinaï exacerbe le problème qu’elle a avec le terrorisme. En avril 2006, 23 touristes ont été tués dans un attentat à la voiture piégée, dans la station touristique de Dahab, dans le Sinaï ; deux jours plus tard, des Observateurs de la Force multinationale de l’ONU, chargés de l’application du traité de paix entre l’Egypte et Israël, ont été la cible d’un attentat-suicide.

Pour le Caire, la menace s’étend au-delà du Sinaï. Les islamistes d’Egypte - menés par les Frères Musulmans – ont enregistré des gains politiques importants, ces dernières années, obtenant 88 des 444 sièges au Parlement en 2005. La perspective d’une connexion entre le Hamas et les Frères Musulmans terrifie le gouvernement égyptien. Pour reprendre l’expression d’un analyste politique égyptien, « le Hamas, c’est les Frères Musulmans sous forme de stéroïdes [hormones] ».

Moins de deux semaines après la brèche dans la frontière de Gaza, Le Caire a pris des mesures draconiennes pour ramener les Palestiniens à Gaza. Il en a arrêté des dizaines – dont un groupe de Palestiniens armés, réputés préparer un attentat contre des touristes israéliens dans le Sinaï – et a promptement scellé à nouveau sa frontière avec des kilomètres de barbelés. Le Hamas a crié à la honte et juré qu’il ne permettrait pas que la frontière reste close. En février, deux gardes-frontière égyptiens ont été blessés par des tirs palestiniens et plusieurs autres ont dû être soignés pour des fractures, après avoir été atteints par des pierres lancées depuis l’autre côté de la frontière.

Du fait de l’accroissement des tensions le long de la frontière, l’Egypte a assoupli sa position concernant la barrière [israélienne] de Cisjordanie. En mars, le ministre des Affaires étrangères, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, a déclaré : « Quiconque veut ériger une barrière de sécurité dans son pays est libre de le faire ». Par la suite, il a été annoncé que l’Egypte utiliserait 23 millions de dollars de l’assistance américaine pour édifier sa propre barrière le long de la frontière avec Gaza.

Des équipes du corps du génie militaire sont attendues sous peu en Egypte, pour encadrer le projet.

Le changement d’attitude du Caire est dû, au moins en partie, à Washington. Durant plus d’une décennie, des armes ont été introduites librement dans Gaza, des tunnels de contrebande omniprésents relient le Sinaï aux zones palestiniennes, et contournent la surveillance israélienne. Mais depuis la prise de pouvoir du Hamas à Gaza, le problème attire de plus en plus l’attention, du fait que des roquettes à plus longue portée - que l’on suppose avoir été transportées via ces tunnels – ont commencé à tomber, avec une plus grande fréquence, sur des villes israéliennes. Au cours des discussions concernant le budget 2008, le Congrès s’est montré si inquiet de l’inaction égyptienne perceptible concernant les tunnels, qu’une clause a été insérée conditionnant l’aide américaine de près de 100 millions de dollars à des mesures égyptiennes pour contrer ces voies de contrebande d’armes.

Pour Le Caire, cette pression américaine a été un mal bienvenu. Le gouvernement égyptien se limite à déverser un flot de bonnes paroles à propos de la crise humanitaire à Gaza, alors qu’au fond, il éprouve de l’appréhension pour le caractère militant de Gaza sous la domination du Hamas. Ces sentiments sont seulement devenus plus intenses du fait des récentes percées politiques et sociales des islamistes d’Egypte.

En définitive, la frontière de Gaza est, plus que toute autre chose, une question de sécurité nationale égyptienne. Aussi, malgré les comparaisons qui ne manqueront pas d’être établies entre les barrières israélienne et égyptienne, Le Caire n’a d’autre d’alternative que d’avancer dans la construction d’un mur à lui. Comme Israël l’a appris il y a quelque temps, les bonnes barrières font les bons voisins, surtout quand vos voisins sont vos ennemis.

David Schenker *

© The Weekly Standard

* David Schenker est membre permanent et directeur du programme de politique arabe à l’Institut d’Etudes du Proche-Orient de Washington.


[Texte aimablement signalé par M. Taub, Israël.]

Le Hamas accuse les Juifs d’avoir organisé la Shoah

juin 7th, 2008

Le Hamas accuse les Juifs d’avoir organisé la Shoah

Categorie: Actualités

–>

Dans le mondeA Gaza

La chaîne de télévision du Hamas a diffusé un documentaire accusant les Juifs d’avoir organisé la Shoah pour se débarasser du «fardeau» que les Juifs invalides constituaient pour l’Etat d’Israël.

–>

Les dirigeants juifs ont élaboré le meurtre massif des Juifs handicapés afin de ne pas avoir à les soutenir et c’est ce meurtre que les Juifs appellent «l’Holocauste», selon un documentaire spécial diffusé le 18 avril sur la chaîne de télévision du Hamas Al Aqsa.

Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) a […] traduit le contenu de ce documentaire et l’a mis en ligne sur le site YouTube sous le titre «Hamas: Jews planned HolocaustHamas : les Juifs ont organisé l’Holocauste»)

D’après le narrateur du documentaire, le premier Premier ministre israélien, David Ben Gurion, avait décidé que les «invalides et les handicapés [juifs] sont un fardeau pour l’Etat», après quoi les «Juifs sataniques» - le film montre alors une image d’un Juif hassidique – «ont élaboré un plan diabolique pour se débarrasser du fardeau des invalides et des handicapés» - le film montre des piles de corps décharnés – «de manière criminelle et tordue».

«Ceci est [diffusé] sur la télévision officielle du Hamas» explique le directeur de PMW Itamar Marcus. «Celle-ci est détenue et totalement contrôlée par les dirigeants du Hamas à Gaza, et est diffusée par satellite dans tout le monde arabophone».

Le programme parle principalement de la Shoah, mais inclut des comparaisons à la situation Palestinienne, appelant les massacres des camps de réfugiés de Sabra et Shatila un «holocauste» et blâmant Israël pour l’«holocauste palestinien»

«Ils [les Juifs] ont été les premiers à inventer les méthodes du mal et de l’oppression» explique le narrateur du documentaire, montrant des scènes de Golda Meir, Moshe Dayan et Ben Gurion.

Le film prétend que les dirigeants Juifs ont blâmé les nazis pour le massacre de Juifs qu’ils ont commis eux-mêmes «afin que les Juifs aient l’air d’être persécuté et [puissent] essayer de tirer profit de la sympathie internationale [à leur égard]»

Le film fait appel à un «expert» - Amin Dabur, directeur du «Centre de recherche stratégiques» - qui explique que «l’Holocauste israélien n’est rien d’autre qu’une plaisanterie et faisait partie du spectacle parfait que Ben Gurion a mis sur pied»

Le film balance entre le fait de blâmer les Juifs pour le massacre et le fait de nier que ce dernier ait eu lieu. Selon Dabur, Ben Gurion voulait envoyer «une jeunesse forte et énergique [pour Israël], tandis que tout le reste – les invalides, les handicapés et les gens avec des besoins particuliers, ont été envoyés [à la mort] – si cela peut être prouvé historiquement» - une référence à un argument souvent entendu sur la chaîne du Hamas, de la part des dirigeants iraniens et ailleurs dans le monde musulman, selon lequel la Shoah n’a pas encore été historiquement prouvée.

Dabur continue: «ils ont été envoyés [à la mort, par les Juifs] pour qu’il y ait un Holocauste, afin qu’Israël puisse “jouer” avec ça [pour obtenir] la sympathie du monde»

Source: Jerusalem Post - mercredi 30 avril 2008

Le ministère palestinien de la Santé a accusé dimanche [27 avril 2008] des membres du Hamas d’avoir ouvert le feu sur des camions-citerne qui devaient livrer des carburants aux hôpitaux de la bande de Gaza

juin 7th, 2008

Cher Gilles Paris, rédacteur du journal Le Monde,

Vous avez apprécié la courtoisie de nos échanges précédents, sachez que pour ce qui me concerne cela continuera de la même façon : ce style, outre ses nombreux avantages en terme de dialogue et de cordialité, constitue en lui-même un petit exercice amusant auquel je n’ai aucune raison de me soustraire.

Je voudrais par la présente m’étonner de ce que, sauf erreur de ma part, l’information selon laquelle, je cite
http://www.7sur7.be/7s7/article/print/detail.do?language=fr&navigationItemId=1505&componentId=258126

“Le ministère palestinien de la Santé a accusé dimanche [27 avril 2008] des membres du Hamas d’avoir ouvert le feu sur des camions-citerne qui devaient livrer des carburants aux hôpitaux de la bande de Gaza, soumise à un blocus israélien.

Des membres du Hamas ont ouvert le feu dimanche dans la bande de Gaza contre des camions-citerne qui devaient livrer des carburants destinés aux hôpitaux de ce territoire“, a indiqué un communiqué publié à Ramallah, en Cisjordanie, où se trouve le siège de l’Autorité palestinienne.



cette information, donc, n’a pas été donnée par votre journal à ses lecteurs. Dites-moi que je fais erreur et que cela m’aura échappé. En tout état de cause, une telle information jette une lumière tellement importante pour comprendre la situation à Gaza, que l’on peut s’étonner qu’un article important, signalé en première page, ne lui soit pas consacré. En outre, la chose est facile à vérifier : la “chose”, c’est-à-dire non pas directement ce qui s’est passé, mais le fait que l’Autorité Palestinienne a bien fait ce communiqué. Du reste, si je ne l’ai pas trouvée en Français, il y a au moins une dépêche en anglais de notre agence de presse favorite, l’AFP, à ce sujet, dépêche donc l’article mentionné plus haut du site www.7sur7.be est la version française :

Sun Apr 27, 3:09 PM ET RAMALLAH, West Bank (AFP) - The Palestinian health ministry in the West Bank on Sunday accused the Islamist Hamas movement of preventing the delivery of fuel oils to hospitals in the Gaza Strip.

“Members of Hamas in the Gaza Strip opened fire on Sunday on fuel trucks that were full of fuel destined for hospitals in the territory,” the ministry said in a statement issued in the Palestinian political capital of Ramallah.

Dans l’attente de votre réponse concernant ce non-traitement par votre journal d’une information essentielle, je vous prie de croire, M. Paris, à l’expression de ma considération distinguée

Anatole Zed

PS 1: A propos de la mort dramatique d’une famille palestinienne le 28 avril dernier, j’ose espérer que vous donnerez dans votre journal toute sa place aux conclusions de l’enquête de l’armée israélienne, selon laquelle “il s’avère que la famille n’a pas été tuée par l’armée israélienne, mais par les explosifs que transportaient 2 terroristes“. A moins de considérer la propagande de l’organisation terroriste Hamas comme plus crédible que les enquêtes diligentées par un Etat démocratique ami de la France, vous n’aurez dans ce traitement aucune raison de favoriser l’explication du Hamas.

PS 2 : Je fais de cette lettre une lettre ouverte en la mettant sur mon blog. Merci de m’indiquer si vous m’autorisez à y publier également votre réponse.

« Previous Entries






Créer un Blog | Nom Domaine | Publicité | Créer Forum | Tag | Signaler Abus
Tags : culture | actualités | politique | bebe | finance | justice | ecologie
net | famille | jeux | droit | voyage | design | livre | internet | grippe | photos